| LARC GUIDELINES FOR POST-PROCEDURAL (POST-SURGICAL)
ANALGESIA IN RESEARCH ANIMALS
Survival surgery and some other procedures
carry the potential for post-procedural pain for laboratory animals.
It
is the Principal Investigator's responsibility to plan for the
assessment and management of this potential animal pain. Appropriate
analgesics,
humane study endpoints, and other techniques must be employed and
documented. All personnel involved in potentially painful experiments
must be adequately trained, experienced and supervised. The Animal
Welfare Assurance Program provides and documents this training.
General guidelines should be refined to fit the particular protocol
and the procedures performed; a veterinarian must be consulted
in planning potentially painful experiments (including some nonsurvival
procedures).
Potentially useful analgesics and their doses can be found on this web site
as well as in published literature. A complete literature search
for refinement alternatives includes the search for post-procedural
pain management. LARC may be able to provide other options if
these suggestions interfere with data collection.
Plans for post-procedural pain or distress assessment and care
are approved as part of a particular IACUC application, as they
vary with species and procedure. Body weight loss is suggested
as an indicator of the animal's welfare. The frequency of assessment
for pain or distress (daily or more frequently) must also be specified.
Analgesics are often administered before signs of pain are clearly
evident. Preoperative or intraoperative administration of analgesics
enhances postsurgical analgesia. (Miller 1994; Institute of Laboratory
Animal Resources 1996) Some anesthetics, such as isoflurane, provide
minimal analgesia once the animal has regained consciousness,
so analgesic administration before anesthetic recovery is strongly
recommended.
All larger animals should have individual health records and
assessments and treatments should be noted here. For rodents,
frogs, etc. a more general statement in a laboratory notebook
may suffice; it should clearly verify that the protocol's provisions
for drug administration and pain or distress assessment are being
followed.
Husbandry techniques and other nonpharmacologic methods should
also be considered to improve animal pain management. These can
include immobilization of body parts that have undergone surgery,
provision of extra bedding, special placement of food and water
or other techniques.
Euthanasia is warranted for pain that cannot be controlled by
other means.
In some instances, use of analgesic drugs could interfere with
the experimental design. This must be clearly explained and
justified
in the IACUC application. Animals on such studies are listed
as USDA Pain Category E animals (Procedures that cause unrelieved
pain or distress).
The university's annual report to regulatory agencies will use
the application's language to report on these painful experiments
for which analgesic drugs are not being administered.
References
Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources (1996). Guide for the
Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington DC, National Academy
Press.
{Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, 1996, #373}
Miller, R. D., Ed. (1994). Anesthesia. New York, Churchill Livingstone. |